Tag Archives: colorlines

“Temporary Relief for DREAMers”

Taken from: http://www.hyphenmagazine.com/blog/archive/2012/06/temporary-relief-dreamers

June 18, 2012

The latest TIME cover.

Obama’s announcement last Friday may give temporary relief to up to 1.4 million undocumented young people in the United States. The executive action seeks to end deportations of those who are in the U.S. without legal documentation but who fall under specific guidelines: they must have arrived in the U.S. before age 16, are younger than 30, have been in the country for at least five continuous years, have no criminal history, graduated from a US high school or earned a GED, or served in the military. Those who qualify will be eligible for two years of “deferred action.”

The pledge comes at a time when legislation such as the federal DREAM (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) Act has been stagnant for at least a decade. In December 2010, the DREAM Act failed to pass Congress by a narrow margin. In the past week, activists from National Immigrant Youth Alliance held sit-ins in several cities, including Los Angeles, Cincinnati, Denver and Oakland, CA.

“I first found out about this announcement when my friends texted me early in the morning, then I saw it all over Facebook,” said Ju Hong, an undocumented student and National Korean American Service & Education Consortium (NAKASEC) youth leader from Northern California, in a statement. ”I was so excited, I almost burst into tears. I have lived in fear of being separated from my friends, my family. Today, I feel liberated from my fears at least temporarily.  This policy change could allow me to better focus on my school work, provide for my family, and continue to fight for the DREAM Act and immigration reform.”

The national United We Dream Network called the move a “momentous act of courage and a profoundly important step toward justice for immigrant youth.” “I am incredibly proud of our community!” said Gaby Pacheco, one of the Trail of Dream walkers in 2010, in an email. “This is the first time, in a very long time that our community gets a win! The best part of this win is that it was the people affected by the issue that made everyone else believe.”

The announcement also comes on the heels of a much-discussed, bold TIME cover story written by Jose Antonio Vargas, an undocumented Filipino who famously wrote about his personal journey as an undocumented, Pulitzer-prize winning journalist in the New York Times a year ago (though Vargas himself will not receive relief under the president’s announcement, since he is 31 years-old).

While this new development is undoubtedly a major victory for the thousands of immigrant rights activists and many immigrant communities in general, the initiative leaves a lot of doubts and unanswered questions.

About a year ago, the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement issued a similarly-wordedinitiative that has proven to be disappointing to immigrant rights’ activists, since those who would qualify for the DREAM Act continued to be placed into deportation proceedings, and continue to be deported despite a promise from the president and ICE that they will not deport DREAMers. Without any hope for the future, some say that life in limbo causes stress, depression and even suicide.

However, those who have been following the legislation and the White House’s response to the communities state that this initiative seems more significant.

“I think the announcement today is more specific than last year’s memo,” Hiroshi Motomura, an immigration law professor at UCLA, told Colorlines’ Julianne Hing. “[It] seems implicitly to be in a context of “we really mean it” as opposed to the fact that much of what the prosecutorial discretion memo of last year seemed to promise never happened.”

The other significant difference is that this new announcement promises to grant work permits to those who are eligible. However, people will need to apply to these, and for some, that means stepping out of the shadows and into the government database in order to even receive a work permit.

Unsurprisingly, much of the coverage around the president’s recent announcement has been framed as a way for the president to target the Latino voters. Even some newspaper headlines focused solely on the Latino population. While this makes sense for a variety of reasons, specifically that the the majority of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. come from Latin American countries, the undocumented population is very diverse. (If you need to see for yourself, check out TIME’s video). Approximately one in 10 undocumented immigrants and immigrant students are from Asia (see Dreams Deferred).

As many involved in the movement know, the DREAM Act, and the president’s move, however bold, is far from a pathway to legal citizenship for the vast majority of undocumented people in the U.S. For one, it is a limited population and does not include the parents of those children, for example, who are often vilified for making the choice to bring their young children to the U.S.

“Ultimately, we need a more permanent solution to our nation’s badly broken immigration system,” said Dae Joong Yoon, executive director of the Korean Resource Center, in a statement. ”We need Congress to also act and move legislation like the DREAM Act that provides path to legalization and includes those who are older than the current age limits. Parents should also be given an opportunity to stay and work in this country through broader comprehensive immigration reform. During this critical election year, we will make sure that our elected officials know this and will make our voices heard at the ballot box.”

The initiative applies to approximately 6 percent of the total of 11.2 million people who are living in fear of deportation in the U.S. The Obama administration has deported approximately 1.2 million people, the largest number under any president in the same time period.

The following is an essay by Ju Hong, undocumented student and recent graduate of UC Berkeley:

One Million Dreams Protected, 10.5 Million Dreams To Go

by Ju Hong

Although I recently graduated from UC Berkeley with a major in Political Science, I am unable to use my degree to work because I am undocumented. Not only did I face a difficult time to finding ways to work, I also faced constant fear of deportation – until President Obama announced last Friday an executive action to stop deportation and provide work permits to a selected group of DREAMers who meet requirements under a new immigration policy.

This historic announcement would not have been possible without the courageous DREAMers who stood up and shared their stories, held events and rallies, contacted elected officials, and led hunger strikes and civil disobedience actions despite risking deportation. After many years of collaborative efforts to demand for justice and equality, the federal government finally made a move to provide a very limited and temporary relief for many undocumented young people in this country.

For many years, I have lived in fears of facing deportation, and permanently leaving the country I called home. The fear of being separated from my friends, my family, and my community; the fear of not being accepted within my own community; the fear of contacting the police at a time of need; and the fear of losing my hope and dreams in graduating from college. Today, I feel liberated from these fears. Because of this announcement, now I can better focus on preparing for my master’s degree program, provide for my family, and continue to advocate for the federal DREAM Act and Comprehensive Immigration Reform.

Prior to June 15, 2012, I was unable to get a job, apply for internships, or qualify for financial aid. Thus, I had to work more than thirty hours of week at a Japanese restaurant, mopping floors and washing dishes, getting paid under the table with below minimum wage, while I commuted to school and enrolled as a full-time student at Laney College, Oakland. Sometimes I had to stay up all night to apply for limited scholarship opportunities to meet the deadlines. Today, I feel free from these obstacles. Because of this policy, I will have open doors of new opportunities to use my degree to work and contribute back to society. Not only will I have the chance to work to support my schoolwork, but also I have capacity to support my family.  Like one of my fellow DREAMers said, “I feel I am normal again.”

With this new policy change, an approximate 800,000 young peoples’ dreams are now protected, at least temporarily. This is huge victory for the undocumented community, but the fight is not over. There are thousands of other young DREAMers who are not eligible to apply for deferred action or work permits because of strict requirements under the new policy. For example, DREAMers who are over 30 years old are not be qualified to receive deferred action or work permits. Moving forward, we must stay involved and pressure Obama’s administration to include the rest of DREAMers because they also have the right to DREAM.

Finally, we must continue to fight for the federal DREAM Act and Comprehensive Immigration Reform because this policy is a temporary solution. Now more than ever, we have strength, conviction, and power in our hands to organize, mobilize, and take collective actions to solve our broken immigration system. Soon, we will fulfill all of the 11.5 million dreams. 

Ju Hong came from South Korea to the United States when he was 11 years-old. Ju attended Laney College in Oakland, CA, where he was elected as the first Asian American undocumented student body president. He graduated from Laney College with a 3.8 GPA and transferred to University of California, Berkeley. This year, he graduated from Cal and is pursuing his master’s degree in public administration.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Posters Celebrate Asian American Masculinity, From George Takei to Jeremy Lin”

Taken from: http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/05/posters_celebrating_asian_manhood.html

May 16, 2012

The “Manhood” poster series was created by artist, and San Francisco native, Deborah Enrile Lao as a way to inspire young Asian American boys and men. The series consists of screen printed posters of five iconic Asian American men—Richard Aoki, George Takei, Jeremy Lin, Bruce Lee and DJ Qbert. In Lao’s artist statement, she writes:

This piece challenges the unkind, one dimensional portrait of Asian American men in mainstream Western media. By exuding strength, creativity, leadership and masculinity, these five icons buck characterizations of Asian American men as meek nerds who never get the girl (or guy). Bold paper colors and a minimal illustration style reclaims the one dimensional space into one that portrays these men as “superheroes” that young boys and men can aspire to be like.

I chatted with her on the phone to talk about her poster series and the inspiration behind them.

ManhoodSeries_DeborahLao2012.jpg

What inspired you to create these posters?

I had just finished an advanced screenprinting class which pushed me to explore and experiment with my personal ideas. I have a young brother—he was an inspiration behind creating the posters. I wondered about how the younger generation of Asian American boys would feel when they grow up, who do they have to look up to? So I came up with the “superhero” concept using primary colors and simple faceless outlines. I want people to be able to see themselves in these icons. The posters represent the ideals behind the people more than just the people themselves. And it started with Bruce Lee.

Why Bruce Lee?

A documentary about him was coming out when I was starting this project. When I was thinking of Asian American male sexuality and virility, Bruce Lee was the first person who came to mind. He was the first cross-over actor who appealed to both black and white audiences, and had international fans.

Asian Americans are always the ones being made fun of, the butt of jokes in mainstream media, and Bruce Lee defies that stereotype. He was well-respected and no one messed with Bruce Lee.

And the others?

I had a hard time thinking of men outside of Bruce Lee. So the purpose of the project was to think of men who had made an impact and remember them. I wanted to create positive portrats of Asian American men. Jeremy Lin seems to be “it” at the moment. He is really living his dream, yet humble, honest and seems really rooted. It’s inspirational to see an Asian American male figure so accepted and revered who is just being himself. To me, he represents the idea of being yourself, living out your dream, and being respected.

After Jeremy Lin, I did George Takei then Richard Aoki and lastly DJ Qbert.

Why DJ Qbert?

I felt like the series needed a fifth person to make it more substantial. Hip-hop has been inclusive within the movement. When the Invisibl Skratch  Piklz came out, they were the first Asians in hip-hop. It didn’t matter what race they were, what mattered was that they could really scratch. And the fact that Qbert is Filipino resonated with me since I’m Chinese-Filipino.

Now you see Asian American hip-hop groups like Far East Movement on MTV, and all these Asian American boys crews winning dance competitions. I feel DJ Qbert lead the way for Asians in hip-hop.

Do you think you will do more with this series? Possibly something with API women icons?

That’s a possibility. I would like to have more representation of Pacific Islanders and  Southeast Asians. But I want the ideas to come organically, naturally, and use people who really resonate with me. I’ve been thinking of extending this to Asian American women such as Patsy Mink. While working on this, names of iconic API women kept coming up.

**************

(Below are the five posters in the series.)

ManhoodAoki_DeborahLao2012.jpg

Richard Aoki

ManhoodTakei_DeborahLao2012.jpg

George Takei


ManhoodLin_DeborahLao2012.jpg

Jeremy Lin

ManhoodLee_DeborahLao2012.jpg

Bruce Lee

ManhoodQBert_DeborahLao2012.jpg

DJ Qbert 
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Finally, Mother’s Day Cards That Actually Make Sense”

Happy Mother’s Day! :) 

Taken from: http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/05/mamas_day_e-cards.html

May 10, 2012

A group of activists and mothers in Oakland, Calif. have started an annual Mother’s Day tradition that would probably put Hallmark to shame. Fed up with the mainstream image of mothers as domestic, middle class, and white, they’ve made a real effort over the past two years to celebrate who they call “mamas on the margins”: all those single, queer, immigrant, and young mothers whose stories are often glossed over by corporate card makers.

Activist-Mama2.pngImmigrant-Mom2.jpg

“I can’t find a Mother’s Day card that looks at our identities in a way that is sentimental for me and my mom,” says Shanelle Matthews, communications coordinator at Forward Together, an Oakland-based organization that’s leading the e-Card drive through its Strong Families initiative. Matthews grew up as one of three kids in a single-parent black household, and wants to celebrate her mother’s hard work. “This campaign is personally close to be because I can finally say something to my mom on Mother’s Day that’s actually of cultural relevance and value.”

Matthews says that the group is aiming to “shift the narrative of “how people think about family. We wanted to create a line of greeting cards that spoke to the marginalized moms in our communities whose faces we never see on the front of those cards.”

Last year, the group released a series of video tributes to young mothers. This time around, they decided to strip the concept down even further by offering up a series of beautifully designed e-Cards that supporters can personalize and send on Mother’s Day. All of the cards feature brown-skinned, non-traditional families and suggest that the act of love is often selfless and, yes, political.

The process of sending a card is pretty simple. Viewers have their choice of 18 cards that they can then customize with a personal message and send to whomever they please. Once the card is sent, supporters can also take a look at one of two online petitions to end funding for abstinence-only education or help support recently incarcerated parents. At present, the cards are only available online, but Matthews says that plans are in the works to create cards that can be distributed in person. “We know it’s not always in the best interests of greeting card companies to highlight the needs of moms on the margins,” says Matthews. “If they did then that would be recognizing that there’s something askew.”

And there’s been plenty askew in the American political climate. The Mamas Day project is in many ways a breath of fresh air in year that’s been resoundingly hard on women, especially those who are poor and of color. While Republicans continue to deny their hand in launching a “War on Women”, the country’s political climate has put women’s bodies and choices on center stage. Gender reporter Akiba Solomon has written about how GOP attacks on Planned Parenthood, a vital source of reproductive care for thousands of women, have continued unabated. Not too long ago, Colorlines.com writer Miriam Zoila Perez retraced the long and troubling history of the anti-abortion movement. (Perez also helms the blog Radical Doula and is a consultant with the Strong Families initiative.)

Two-Mamas1.png

The group has also kept a running dialogue on motherhood up as part of its Mamas Day Our Way blog series. It’s a candid look at mamahood from varying perspectives: the ambivalent, could-be mom; the mom battling against environmental racism to help fight her kids’ asthma; the ecstatic, new LGBT family.

The group reached out to eight artists to design the cards, including Melanie Cervantes and Nikki McClure. And they say that the experience has been overwhelmingly positive.

Artist Joy Liu said she loved making the cards. “Designing a card specifically for a mother who has experienced loss, and a card celebrating an immigrant mom, was very thought provoking for me as an artist,” said Liu. “I think the bigger vision of motherhood that these cards are promoting is powerful, and I loved the process of depicting it visually.”

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Members of New York Legislature Wear Hoodies to Legislative Session”

Inspiring and powerful images.

Taken from: http://www.colorlines.com/archives/2012/03/members_of_new_york_legislature_wear_hoodies_to_legislative_session_photos.html

March 26, 2012

New York State Senator Eric Adams and his colleagues honored Trayvon Martin on Monday by wearing hoodies to the March 26, 2012 Senate legislative session in Albany.

The images below were uploaded to Facebook by Senator Eric Adams.

ny-law-makers.jpg

nystatesenatorshoodies.jpg

ny-state-sen-hoodies-3.jpg

Tagged , , , , , , ,

“No Acting Oscar in the Last Decade Has Gone to Latino, Asian, or Native American”

Taken from: http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/02/no_acting_oscar_in_the_last_decade_has_gone_to_latino_asian_american_or_native_american.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

February 26, 2012

In 2002, Halle Berry became the first African-American actress to win an Academy award for Best Actress but since then all Best Actress winners been white.

“This moment is for Dorothy Dandridge, Lena Horne, Diahann Carroll. It’s for the women that stand beside me – Jada Pinkett, Angela Bassett and it’s for every nameless, faceless woman of color that now has a chance because this door tonight has been opened,” Berry said in her moving acceptance speech in 2002.

But the “door” that “has been opened” that Berry spoke of has a long way to go. All Best Actress winners since her 2002 win have been white.

And no winner in any acting category during the last ten years has been Latino, Asian American, or Native American, according to a new study titled “Not Quite a Breakthrough: The Oscars and Actors of Color, 2002-2012,” that was sponsored by the Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Law and Social Policy, UC Berkeley School of Law and the UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.

The study begins by noting “the Oscar nominees this year include two black women who are favored to win: Viola Davis, nominated for Best Actress, and Octavia Spencer, nominated for Best Supporting Actress. Another actor of color, Demián Bichir, a Latino, was a surprise nominee for Best Actor. This scenario recalls 2002, when Halle Berry and Denzel Washington won Academy Awards for Best Actress and Best Actor in a year that also included Will Smith’s nomination for Best Actor and Sidney Poitier’s receipt of an honorary Oscar for lifetime achievement.”

Some of the brief’s findings:

  • All Best Actress winners since 2002 have been white.
  • No winner in any acting category during the last ten years has been Latino, Asian American, or Native American.
  • Oscar winners and nominees of color make fewer movies per year after their nominations than their white peers do.
  • Oscar winners and nominees of color are more likely than their white peers to work in television, which is considered lower-status work.
  • Oscar winners and nominees of color are less likely than their white peers to receive subsequent nominations.
  • The Best Supporting Actress category is the most diverse, with women of color constituting 32 percent of the nominees, according to the report.

Despite the depressing findings things are improving. Little by little.

From 1990 through 2000, about 9 percent of the Oscar nominees in the top categories were people of color. From 2002 through 2012, almost 20 percent of nominees were people of color, which is a notable increase.

A recent LA Times investigation found 94% of Academy voters are white. A catalyst to increasing the diversity of Oscar nominees would be to increase the diversity in itself.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Why Microsoft’s So-Called ‘Avoid Ghetto’ App Is Really American”

Taken from: http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/01/why_microsofts_so-called_avoid_ghetto_app_is_really_american.html

January 31, 2012

Microsoft has recently been at the center of a whirlwind of controversy over a new app that critics allege is downright racist. On January 3, the company was granted a patent for technology related to its “Pedestrian Route Production” application, a tool that that the company says would navigate the user “safely through neighborhoods with violent crime statistics below a certain threshold.”

While the patent makes no explicit references to race, the project has been unofficially dubbed the “Avoid Ghetto App” by various online news sites. Microsoft, for its part, has been silent throughout the ordeal, and declined to comment on the matter to Colorlines.com. But intentions aside, the fact that the app was so quickly racialized begs the larger question of how and why technology perpetuates systemic racism, and why consumers should care.

“Almost the moment this patent got granted, [this app] got racialized so that ‘violent crime’ became ‘mugging’, which became ‘black and Latino people’, which became ‘ghetto,’ ” says Sarah Chinn, a professor of English at the City University of New York and author of the book “Technology and the Logic of American Racism.” Chinn has been among Microsoft’s most vocal critics.

Microsoft’s app has stirred so much discussion, Chinn says, because the United States is a “very racist country. When you say the words ‘violent crime’, in the public imagination that turns into ‘dangerous urban black man or Latino man.’ “

Others disagree. Industry analyst Rob Enderline told NPR last week that Microsoft’s project is just a matter of technology trying to make life easier for users. “It’s part of an overall effort to make navigation systems more intelligent so they keep you out of danger, whether you’re driving or you’re on foot,” Enderle told NPR.

Yet even if that’s the case, it’s based on the widely held misconception that violent crime is more likely to hit random strangers. In fact, the opposite is true. The vast majority of violent crime happens to people who know each other. For instance, 75 percent of rapes are committed by someone the survivor already knows, according to statistics provided by San Francisco Women Against Rape. The majority of murders are committed by members of ones own racial group. Missouri has the nation’s highest black homicide rate, and when the Violent Prevention Center looked at statistics from 2009, it found that—whenever the relationship could be identified—76 percent of black murder victims were killed by someone they knew.

In Washington, D.C. and New York City, robberies are on the decline.

Huffington Post’s Black Voices points out that the FBI’s 2010 crime report revealed that whites were arrested more often for violent crimes that year than any other race. But, according to Chinn, the myth that black men in particular are more likely to perpetrate violent crime against white strangers resonates so strongly because it’s become an indelible part of America’s racial identity.

“This is a myth that’s been with us since the days of Reconstruction,” Chinn told Colorlines.com, calling the period an era of “terrorism against black people.” Chinn noted that whites unconsciously knew that they were the perpetrators of violence against black people, particularly sexual violence against black women. Thus the myth of dangerous black men evolved as way to justify racist violence against black communities. The logic, Chinn says, was “you’re violent so we have to criminalize you, we have to put you in jail, we have to stop-and-frisk you, and we have to move out of your neighborhoods.”

Microsoft’s new technology is just the latest in a series of scientific parallels with the past.

The problem isn’t the technology itself, but what people imagine the technology will do. So while DNA and finger printing may on the surface be seemingly race-neutral technologies that only offer specific information about someone’s body, they’re quickly used to reinforce people’s preconceived ideas about race. “Once they enter the public discourse in the United States it’s all about how can we identify [people of color] and prove that they are not as good as white people, or prove that segregation is justified,” says Chinn.

Chinn does not expect that Microsoft will market the app as it is now, but will fold it into its next generation of mapping technology. ”It’s really about why we should be afraid of certain neighborhoods and certain kinds of people. People take these technologies and they use them to ‘prove’ things that they actually already believe about people of various racialized groups.”

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“If I Were A White, Male Middle Aged Forbes Columnist…”

Taken from: http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/12/if_i_were_a_white_male_middle_aged_forbes_columnist_1.html

December 14, 2011

In a reaction to President Obama’s big, pragmatic, race-free economic inequality speech in Osawatomie, Kansas, “Forbes” tech writer Gene Marks crafted a recklessly condescending column called “If I Were a Poor Black Kid.”In just two days, this white, middle aged keyboard monkey madness has garnered 518 comments on the site and God knows how many page views. It’s officially Internet catnip.

Now Marks, who in his bio describes himself as “a short, balding and mediocre certified public accountant,” starts off well enough:

The President’s speech got me thinking. My kids are no smarter than similar kids their age from the inner city. My kids have it much easier than their counterparts from West Philadelphia. The world is not fair to those kids mainly because they had the misfortune of being born two miles away into a more difficult part of the world and with a skin color that makes realizing the opportunities that the President spoke about that much harder. This is a fact. In 2011.

But things start to fall apart when Marks takes on the rhetorical style of Miss Grant’s “You got big dreams” speech from “Fame” Season 1:

I am not a poor black kid. I am a middle aged white guy who comes from a middle class white background. So life was easier for me. But that doesn’t mean that the prospects are impossible for those kids from the inner city. … It takes brains. It takes hard work. It takes a little luck. And a little help from others. It takes the ability and the know-how to use the resources that are available. Like technology.

Having established his alleged expertise, Marks goes on to negate the very privilege he’s stating and put the onus of hundreds of years of structural racism and decade after decade of class stratification on the shoulders of, drum roll, poor black kids:

If I was a poor black kid I would first and most importantly work to make sure I got the best grades possible. I would make it my #1 priority to be able to read sufficiently. I wouldn’t care if I was a student at the worst public middle school in the worst inner city. Even the worst have their best. And the very best students, even at the worst schools, have more opportunities. Getting good grades is the key to having more options. With good grades you can choose different, better paths. If you do poorly in school, particularly in a lousy school, you’re severely limiting the limited opportunities you have.

The assumption here, of course, is that poor black kids in West Philadelphia (the ‘hood I’m from, by the way) don’t like reading and writing, that they’re too busy hippidity hopping and bling-fixating to make their shitty schools work for them.

Within this frame, Marks offers a range of subpar-to-mediocre stopgaps. For instance, if he were a poor black kid, he would “visit study sites like SparkNotes and CliffsNotes to help me understand books.” (Right. Because nothing says “I’m prepared to compete in a global information economy” like CliffsNotes.)

Without giving any meaningful consideration to the new digital divide, Marks also says he’d “watch relevant teachings on Academic Earth, TED and the Khan Academy,” when possible “get my books for free at Project Gutenberg” and “learn how to do research at the CIA World Factbook and Wikipedia to help me with my studies.”

Armed with what he describes as “cheap computers” from outlets like Tiger Direct and the Dell Outlet, Marks’s hypothetical black kid will get himself into “nationally recognized magnet schools like Central, Girls High and Masterman,” competitive public institutions that require high standardized test scores and stellar grades. And for the ones who don’t make the cut, says Marks, there’s the option of private school tokenism:

Most private schools I know are filled to the brim with the 1%. That’s because these schools are exclusive and expensive, costing anywhere between $20 and $50k per year. But there’s a secret about them. Most have scholarship programs. Most have boards of trustees that want to give opportunities to kids that can’t afford the tuition. Many would provide funding for not only tuition but also for transportation or even boarding. Trust me, they want to show diversity. They want to show smiling, smart kids of many different colors and races on their fundraising brochures. If I was a poor black kid I’d be using technology to research these schools on the internet, too, and making them know that I exist and that I get good grades and want to go to their school.

The irony of Marks’s vision is that it’s so thoroughly mediocre. He can flaunt his own “I don’t know much about much” ethos because he’s not a poor black kid. The reality is that to compete in earnest with the children of middle class, white male tech writers, poor black kids (and their brown, Asian and Native American sistren and brethren) have to be beyond excellent. And they still might not get the fucking scholarship. Hell, they might not even have a secure, safe place to live. (Thanks subprime housing market!)

Marks could have used technology himself and Googled to find a few of the structural barriers he glances past. In just the past couple of months we’ve seen news that black students get suspended at a far higher rate for the same infractions as white students; that all but four of the students NYPD arrested this summer and fall were black or Latino; and that those poor black kids who evade the police-state in their schools and make it to college aren’t finding Marks’s easy-grab scholarships, since one in three of them owe more than $38,000.

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

“Native American Youth to Diane Sawyer: We’re Not Poverty Porn”

Taken from: http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/12/native_american_youth_to_abcs_diane_sawyer_were_more_than_poverty.html

December 14, 2011

Last month ABC’s 20/20 aired a special they called “Children of the Plains,” that portrayed the Lakota Indian reservation as a place that only dealt with crime, unemployment, alcoholism, overcrowded trailers and crumbling schools.

On Monday, young Native American students from Rosebud, South Dakota released a short video that challenged the claims made by “Children of the plains.” “I know what you probably think of us…we saw the special too. Maybe you saw a picture, or read an article. But we want you to know, we’re more than that…We have so much more than poverty.”

“The stories are manipulative to the point of tears—literally,” wrote Rob Schmidt on Indian Country about the show. “A boy cries because his mother is an alcoholic. A girl cries because she tried to commit suicide. The school principal, an old lady in a motorized chair, cries because her work is so difficult.” Schmidt argues the ABC documentary was little more than poverty porn because it didn’t offer any historical context or the causes of poverty for many Native American reservations. “Are the Lakota responsible for their own plight, or is someone—the government or big business—causing it?,” Schmidt continued.

Sawyer glossed over broken treaties, stolen land and disinvestment by the end of the show, but by then it’s too little, too late. “The ‘poverty porn’ feeling predominates,” Schmidt said.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“‘New Yorker’ Magazine Cover Depicts Pilgrims Fleeing Across U.S. Border”

Taken from:

http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/11/artist_illustrates_what_it_would_look_like_if_it_was_pilgrims_crossing_the_border.html

November 23, 2011

The cover of the November 28th issue of the “New Yorker” includes an illustration of a woman dressed as a pilgrim crossing what looks like the US-Mexico border. The illustration is titled “Promised Land” and it was done by Christoph Niemann, an illustrator, designer and author of Abstract Sunday, a column for the “New York Times Magazine.”

“Too often in politics, very complex subjects are being turned into sound bites, so it’s easy to take them apart,” Niemann, explained to the “New Yorker.” In “Promised Land,” he says, “I draw a parallel between current immigrants and early settlers — the hope is that it will provide context, to help keep things in perspective. Cartoonists, not politicians, should be the ones who condense political discussions into simple images.”

Niemann was born in Germany and moved to New York City in 1997. However, after 11 years he moved back to Berlin with his wife and three sons.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

“NYC Muslim Leaders Encourage Residents to Know Their Rights”

Taken from:  http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/11/nyc_muslims_less_like_to_collaborate_with_police_after_one_too_many_undercover_stings.html 

November 15, 2011

Leaders in New York City’s Muslim community are warning people to be watchful of potential undercover NYPD and FBI informants. So they’re holding teach-in’s to help members of the community diagnose the problem and understand their rights.

Insiders say the government’s surveillance efforts are certain to further strain relations between NYPD and the Muslims in the city. The Associated Press is reporting that Muslim community leaders are openly teaching people how to identify police informants, encouraging them to always talk to a lawyer before speaking with the authorities, and reminding people already working with law enforcement that they have the right to change their minds.

The news comes after the AP released an investigation that revealed the NYPD dispatched plainclothes officers to eavesdrop in Muslim communities. The report found hundreds of mosques and restaurants were infiltrated to build a database on what the department later called “daily life inside Muslim neighborhoods.”

In a story published Monday, the AP describes some methods being used in the teach-in’s:

At a recent “Know Your Rights” session for Brooklyn College students, someone asked why Muslims who don’t have anything to hide should avoid talking to police.“Most of the time it’s a fishing expedition,” answered Ramzi Kassem, a law professor at the City University of New York. “So the safest thing you can do for yourself, your family and for your community, is not to answer.”

A recently distributed brochure from the City University of New York Law School warns people to be wary when confronted by someone who advocates violence against the U.S., discusses terror organizations, is overly generous or is aggressive in their interactions. The brochure said that person could be a police informant.“Be very careful about involving the police,” the brochure said. “If the individual is an informant, the police may not do anything … If the individual is not an informant and you report them, the unintended consequences could be devastating.”

Muslim communities nationwide have faced a increased amounts of surveillance since 9/11. In a Colorlines.com story published in September, Asraa Mustufa wrote about Muslims in Irvine, California whose communities were being infiltrated by FBI and CIA informants. The policies that allow the agencies to conduct undercover surveillance in Muslim neighborhoods are sanctioned by the Obama administration. To make matters even worse, the administration strengthened a national security provision that makes it nearly impossible for communities and individuals to protect their rights through lawsuits after they’ve been infiltrated.Mustufa explained on Colorlines:

The provision, known as the state secrets privilege, permits the government to block discovery in a lawsuit of any information that, if disclosed, could adversely affect national security or foreign relations.

During his first presidential campaign, Barack Obama vowed to end the type of undercover surveillance that Muslim communities around the country are now dealing with. Of course, that didn’t happen. But not only did it not happen, government surveillance and the legal mechanisms to protect is has reached nearly unprecedented levels.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Report: 66 Percent of Hate Crime Victims Targeted Because of Anti-Latino Bias”

Taken from: http://colorlines.com/archives/2011/11/number_of_anti-latino_hate_crimes_in_2010_highest_in_almost_a_decade.html

November 15, 2011

The FBI’s annual Hate Crime Statistics report was released on Monday, and the numbers show a dramatic spike in crimes against Latinos. In total, the study reported that 66.6 percent of victims of ethnically motivated hate crimes in 2010 were targeted because of anti-Latino bias. It is the highest percentage of victims targeted for their Latino heritage in almost a decade.

There was an 11 percent spike from the previous year’s report that showed Latinos accounting for nearly 45 percent of hate crimes based on ethnicity or national origin. “These crimes basically target you for who you are,” the FBI’s Erik Vasys said later in a press conference. “There’s a lot of factors that go into possible rises in statistics. It could be anything from more agencies participating to better and more accurate reporting.”

While the FBI says it’s unclear why hate crimes agaisnt Latinos are on the rise, it is important to note that between 2000 and 2010, the Latino population grew by 43 percent — or four times the nation’s 9.7 percent growth rate. All fifty states and Washington D.C. saw rises in the Latino population.

Some say the number of hate crimes may even be higher for Latinos because they’re the least likely to report crimes against them. Mark Potok, a spokesperson for the Southern Poverty Law Center, told The Huffington Post:  “One thing to understand is that Latinos, and in particular undocumented immigrants, are among the least likely to report hate crimes because they fear deportation.”

The Hate Crime Statistics Program of the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program collects data regarding criminal offenses that are motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender’s bias against a race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity/national origin, or disability and are committed against persons, property, or society.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers